Descrizione
SPECIFICATIONS
Brand Name: Nabila
Function: Red Dot
High-concerned chemical: none
Magnification: ≤6
Model Number: AOCG2s
Origin: Mainland China
Type: OPTICS
Adjustable 4×32 Red Dot 1x 4x Scope Red Dot Tactical Scope 20mm Rail Scope for Hunting
From $199.99
SPECIFICATIONSBrand Name: NabilaFunction: Red DotHigh-concerned chemical: noneMagnification: ≤6Model Number: AOCG2sOrigin: Mainland ChinaType: OPTICS
Pagamento rapido
Resi entro 30 giorni
Garanzia 12 mesi
Sostituzione gratuita 30 giorni
Spedizione in tutto il mondo
18+ · Solo adultiSolo giocattolo - non è un’arma da fuoco e non può sparare munizioni reali.Ogni blaster include una punta arancione non rimovibile, come richiesto dalla normativa federale USA 15 CFR 1150.Sicurezza e conformità →
Informazioni aggiuntive
| Color | Red Cross, Green, Red, Green Cross, Tan Chevron |
|---|
Edwin Sauer –
Nice piece for the price. Well built.
Norris Champlin –
Hello, look at the red dot sight and telescopic sight, in my opinion if you are a shooter with an AR15 it will work without problem, it’s not an original Trijicon but it’s cheaper and has nothing to envy, I calibrated it with a laser bore sight in the shape of 5.56 and it turned out great!
Marcos Wiegand –
Cad with came with is nice, and i’m shocked it’s made of metal. feels great! looks pretty decent too, red-dot is very clear and the dots good not all bluey and out of focus. the glass of the actual optics good, chevron is bright and clear, wish the ranging reticle was a little bit thicker/ darker but other than that no real complaints. solid, shipped quick, carry case is nice and the optics like great quality. i give it 4.6/5. once i get it mounted and do some range shooting i’ll edit this when/ if it holds 0 or not.
Marshall Marks –
It’s a fine tactical optic for the price and the look is nice overall, but eye relief is lacking and you shouldn’t expect top tier glass.
Tiana Mann –
It’s not a trijicon but it didn’t cost $1,800.00 either. For the money i spent it works great.
Tomasa Hudson –
Wasn’t sure i wanted to spend the money for a real acog when i’d never used one before, so i thought this would be a good way to test the waters. It’s built solid and the optics are pretty good (i have other tirjicon products and it doesn’t quite match their quality for glass clarity or color but for the price it’s excellent). I put this on my new ar build. It took 20 rounds of 5.56 to zero and held zero for at least the next 200 rounds. If it keeps holding zero, i may not bother with the tirjicon. Would it survive a drop from a helicopter or a swim in the ocean, maybe, maybe not. It does feel pretty solid but for the price, you could get 20 of these for one acog so if you break it, just get another. For a weekend warrior, you can’t really beat it. If i were using it in the field as an operator and my life depended on it functioning in any condition, i’d probably opt for the original but for competition, hunting or range trips, this can’t be beat.
Robt Ankunding –
This is my second one of these. I have it on two of my ar15s and it has not lost zero after 1000 rounds of 5.56. The glass is very clear (for the cost) and the optic feels fairly rugged. It does not feel cheap at all. Is it as good as the original, probably not. I own several tirjicon optics (3 sros and an rmm hd mrs), which are indestructible and have the clearest glass. I’ve never used an original acog, but i bet the glass is a bit clearer and it’s built like a tank. If you’re actually going to use one of these in a tactical situation on the regular, i’d go with the original, but for plinking or home defense, this thing is reliable enough i’d bet my life on it. And you could by more than ten of these for the cost of one acog so if you do manage to break it (it seems fairly solid, though i haven’t dropped it on concrete), you can buy another or 5.
Dalton Krajcik –
My biggest problem with it is that the holes for the red dot’s piggyback mount weren’t drilled perfectly, so the mount angles the red dot way to the left. Thankfully, by adjusting the windage all the way to the wall, the dot was very close centered with the acog reticle, but that’s as far as the dot could be moved to the right.
The eye relief sucks, just over an inch (seems worse than a real acog), but that’s expected with these knock-offs, so nothing new there. It’s got a little blur around the edges, but nothing too bad. The reticle is super sharp, very nice. The fiber works great, and a mini glow stick and tape could be your “tritium” for the dark. The iron sight placement seems weird.
Feels solid for the price. Totally completes the “acog” look.
I got mine around 5 days earlier than it said i was supposed to.
I spent $64 for the combo, so i would definitely recommend it if this is what you’re looking for an acog + rmr for your tactical blaster.
Teisha Schuster –
Generally impressed at the quality of the optic. Wish it had the logo tho
Malcolm Moore –
Everything is just like the picture. no brand names on it. completely black and the fiber optic does work.
Carol Macejkovic –
Fits on the rail. easy to adjust. however the zoom is essentially only good for a 100m
Anibal Nienow –
Took this out to the range today. was able to quickly get both scope and red dot zeroed. illuminated dot and chevron are bright, even with my poor eyesight. eye relief is decent. the other scope markings are small and not as bright but still acceptable. i was honestly surprised at how well it functions, considering it’s not an “official ” acog.
Lorenza Fadel –
The scope has a very clear view, windage and elevation adjustments work as intended. after zeroing in the scope it continued to hold zero. this was not mounted on an tactical blaster but an actual ar-15. the recoil did not affect zero. definitely recommend
Evelin King –
Came as described, it works perfect for my small caliber blaster
Dallas Rath –
Just as described. an acog copy. sturdy built and actually works. holding zero after 200 rounds of .556